NEW RESEARCH
FINDINGS
Predicting Autism
Specific Behaviours Seen in Infants Can Predict Austism
Detecting Austim Early, Scientific American Mind, October/November 2006
When Does Autism Start?, Newsweek, February 28, 2005
Specific behaviors
seen in infants can predict autism,
new research
shows
HAMILTON, ON-- Canadian researchers
have become the first to pinpoint specific behavioral
signs
in infants as young as 12 months that can predict,
with remarkable accuracy, whether a child will
develop autism.
The preliminary findings, published
in the April-May 2005 issue of the International Journal of Developmental
Neuroscience, were taken from an ongoing study
of 200 Canadian
infants, the largest study of its kind in the
world. The infants, many of whom have been
followed from
birth to 24 months, are younger siblings of
children who have been diagnosed with autism.
Studies
show that families with one autistic child have
a roughly 5-10% chance of a second
child being
diagnosed with autism, a rate of recurrence
about 50 times higher than the general population.
The
Canadian study, which began as a collaboration
of McMaster University’s Offord Centre
for Child Studies in Hamilton, The Hospital for
Sick Children in Toronto and the IWK Health Centre
in
Halifax, has gained international attention.
Initially funded by The Hospital for Sick Children
Foundation,
and currently by the Canadian Institutes
of Health Research (CIHR), it has mushroomed
into
a global
initiative involving leading autism researchers
in 14 cities across Canada and the U.S.
Chaired
by Lonnie Zwaigenbaum, a developmental pediatrician
with the Offord Centre and
McMaster Children’s Hospital and
a lead investigator for the Canadian study,
the Canada-U.S. “Baby
Sibs Research Consortium” is supported
by the National Alliance for Autism Research
(NAAR)
and the National Institute of Child Health
and Human Development (NICHD) in the U.S.
It is widely
regarded as one the most exciting developments
in autism research today. “
This is groundbreaking work that is pushing the
frontier of what we know about the biological
nature of autism, and why it emerges so early
in life,” says
Dr. Zwaigenbaum. “Our hope is that
it will lead to the development of new
and earlier treatments
that could make a huge difference for these
children.”
Second only to mental retardation
as the most common developmental disability,
autism
forms
part of
a spectrum of related disorders referred
to as the autism spectrum disorders (ASDs).
Although
symptoms can range from mild to severe,
those affected typically exhibit severe
impairments
in social
interaction and communication, and engage
in repetitive, solitary activities.
The
complex nature of the disorder makes it difficult
to diagnose. In the absence
of any
biological
marker, clinicians have been typically
forced to rely on
parental reports, home videos and direct
observations of behavior, using standardized
tools like
the Checklist for Autism in Toddlers
(CHAT). But
these tools were designed for children
18 months and
older; there has been no instrument to
measure autistic behaviors in young infants.
So
the Canadian researchers designed their own.
Led by Susan Bryson, Craig
Chair in
Autism Research
at the IWK Health Centre/Dalhousie
University, and co-lead investigator for the study,
they developed the Autism Observation
Scale for
Infants (AOSI).
The scale maps the development of infants
as young as 6 months against 16 specific
risk
markers for
autism, including such behaviors such
as not smiling in response to the smiles
of
others
or not responding
when one’s name is called. “
The predictive power of these markers is remarkable”, says Dr.
Zwaigenbaum. “We
are finding that within this high-risk group of siblings, almost all
of the children who are diagnosed with autism by age 2 years have 7
or more of these markers
by the time they are a year old.”
The researchers found that
even at 6 months of age there were certain behaviors that distinguished
those siblings later diagnosed with autism
from other
siblings. These included a passive temperament and decreased activity
level at age 6
months, followed by extreme irritability, a tendency to fixate
on objects, reduced social
interaction and lack of facial expression as they approached the
age of 12 months. At 1 year, these same children
also showed difficulties
with
language
and communication – they
used fewer gestures, understood fewer phrases and had lower scores
for both expressive and receptive language.
It is not known whether
these risk markers constitute an early manifestation of the disorder,
or are behaviors that reduce the
child’s opportunities
to learn from social experiences, thereby contributing to a pattern
of development that may lead to autism. Still, the results shed
new light on when autism starts
and how early it can be detected.
“
This is an important breakthrough in our understanding of the
initial behavioral signs of autism,” says Peter Szatmari,
Director of the Offord Centre and a member of the Canadian
research team. “By identifying these
signs in children as soon as they are detectable, clinicians
will be able to diagnose
earlier, interventions can begin earlier, and we can improve
the long-term outcomes for these children.”
Jessica
Brian, who with Wendy Roberts is one of two investigators
at The Hospital for Sick Children working on the study, has
already developed
and begun to
evaluate innovative interventions for infants showing early
signs.
Read the Journal abstract
Read The Bottom Line: Can Autism
be predicted?
|