SEARCH
 
< previous section


Preparing the Groundwork
for Evaluation

1.2 Define the evaluation purpose and scope

Communities are coming to understand that steps taken to help children’s development can have long lasting consequences for their health, happiness and success as adults. Evaluations that look at the effects of programs launched to help youth can provide data to validate programming efforts and directions and guide programming change. Some types of evaluation do not consider program effects.

What is the evaluation purpose? What is to be evaluated?

This toolkit provides guidance for extending evaluation to include outcomes.

At the outset of planning, understand the different types of evaluations, what you and others expect to achieve and set parameters accordingly to avoid later confusion and encourage a shared purpose among stakeholders.
Types of evaluations include: service evaluation, process evaluation, organizational review, outcome evaluation.

  • service evaluation (also called program evaluation) looks at service delivery,
  • what is delivered to participants
  • how it compares with what the organizers promised would be done
  • customer service –quality of participants’ experience and satisfaction
  • process evaluation looks at how/how well the program is delivered
  • what relationships are involved
  • how well they operate
  • addresses weaknesses, e.g., what is not being done and why
  • an organizational review looks at organizational set-up for service delivery
  • roles and responsibilities of staff
  • resources
  • performance
  • training needs
  • outcome evaluation looks beyond service delivery
  • to assess a program’s value to participants, in terms of
    • what benefits participants and others gained from program,
    • what changes may have occurred in them (knowledge, skills, attitudes and behaviour)
    • possible ripple effect in the family, classroom and/or
      community
  • basic questions include:
    • Is the program meeting the needs of participants?
    • Why might it not be?
    • Is the strategy working as planned?
    • Is the program reaching the target audience?

For whom and why is the evaluation being done?

Motivating Factors

Motivations may include:

  • funders’ requirements
  • public relations
  • to fulfill partnership demands or
  • for a research agenda.

Evaluations of existing programs may also be called for

  • to encourage sustainability

OR

In response to

  • specific questions raised in the community
  • observations raised by staff, both positive and negative

Intended Benefits

  • trustworthy information that will be meaningful to staff, volunteers and families
  • a transparent process
  • greater feeling of input from community stakeholders
  • community support
  • data may allow stakeholders to consider how programming benefits can repay present, or offset future, costs

What should be included?

“Be sure that whatever you do is useful to the project itself, not just an add-on to keep funders happy. Think: what do we who are delivering the program want to know to help us get smarter faster? Build on that.”
– Dr. Fay Martin, Executive Director,
Family Services of Haliburton County

Whatever initiated the evaluation will dictate to some extent the questions asked

Building-block data for evaluation

  • description of program activities, times, duration, venues
  • participant data: registration, full name, contact information
  • volunteer data: application data, training material
  • Record what and how programming was delivered in order to learn more about what types of activities and strategies can be most effective.
  • program materials
  • costs (actual and donated)
  • outcomes data (See Step 2)

Monitoring program costs

Monitoring and regulating costs are aspects of accountability: determining how much a program costs to deliver benefits to the community.

Consider the total cost of remounting a program.

Track actual spending and the value of donated goods and services, e.g.,

  • resources
  • facilities
  • volunteer time
  • discounts and subsidized costs
Programs will not be copied and operated in other areas, despite evidence of effectiveness, if they are too expensive for most communities to run

Donated contributions reflect the value of staff and community support to your program:

  • useful knowledge to aid fundraising
  • show areas of vulnerability and strengths that could have a bearing on sustainability

 

< previous section
Last updated: July 2004
© 2004