
Preparing the Groundwork
for
Evaluation
1.5 Include ethics and respect for individuals
Ethical Concerns
Informed consent
The principle of informed consent implies that
parents understand their or their children’s
role in an evaluation:
- that activities will be observed or
- that they will be asked to complete questionnaires
on certain topics
Similarly, other informants should be informed
on the general nature of the evaluation, asked for
cooperation and treated respectfully. Participants
or other informants may be reluctant to provide personal
information (or have you ask children for it.) Staff
may feel discomfort at having to collect some types
of personal information. (See Step
5)
Unbiased data
Informed consent may seem at odds with unbiased
data.
Informants may be reluctant to voice any criticism
of programs if they think:
- negative information will be linked to
their children, with negative repercussions
-
don’t have confidence in personnel
-
don’t understand how data will be used
- valued programs may be jeopardized
Raised expectations
Be aware of what an evaluation can change. Volunteers,
participants and families may respond enthusiastically
toward an evaluation, particularly if there is a therapeutic
or service element to the program, but have unrealistically
high expectations of results. They may expect some
follow up to improve their lives or situation or program
expansion, which leads to disappointment in the program
when it does not materialize.
Ethical policies
- Plan data collection carefully to obtain
meaningful data and avoid potential problems (see
Step 4)
- Plan clear, open communication and develop
relationships of trust with staff and sources of
data
- Obtain informed consent from families
to obtain necessary data
- Plan safeguards to assure privacy and
confidentiality of information (See
Step 5)
-
Ensure staff is aware how releasing information,
personal stories, pictures, data for publicity might
affect participants’ lives. Parents may not
be aware of potential risks.
Need an Example?
After a club identified and publicly praised
a youth member as a former gang member
who had turned his life around with the
help of their youth program,
former gang associates attacked both
him and family members. The club then
revised its policy about identifying
individuals, even with permission
|