 Designing
the Data Collection Process
3.3 Make data
collection accessible and convenient for collectors
Usefulness of records for data collection depends
not only on planning but on their completeness, consistency
and accuracy.
Simplify the collection process
- ensure as much consistency as possible,
- provide sufficient time and staff to
allow timely, on-site recording of data, observations
etc.
Use trained collectors
The old computer adage of ‘garbage
in, garbage out’ applies equally to data collection
and evaluation.
- provide training for special skills, e.g.,
interviewing techniques, facilitating focus groups,
- or hire experienced volunteers/personnel
Ask for regular feedback
A welcoming atmosphere, time to chat with
parents after the program, approachable, multi-cultural, multi-lingual
volunteers and staff, a suggestion box, telephone ‘progress’ chats,
inclusive programming, outings and get-togethers with parents
are all methods used by some programs to include parents and
make it easier to include them in program evaluation.
- what is working well
- what procedures need to be modified to ensure
good data collection.
Monitor data collection
- check regularly that data is being collected in
the form requested
- make timely adjustments if difficulties or gaps
are apparent
External data sources
- What data would be helpful?
- to evaluate broader program
objectives or
- to add to or confirm data from
internal sources, e.g., family, classroom,
neighbourhood characteristics
- Assess the factors mentioned previously (usefulness,
ease of collection, cost, sensitivity and credibility)
- Regarding ease of collection, consider convenience
for informants as well as data collectors
- timing of interviews, surveys,
data pick-up, venues, permission from parents and authorization
of
superiors, other authorities (principal, social
agencies.) Agencies
that depend on teachers to complete questionnaires
find data collection more difficult if the timing
coincides with periods when teachers are busy
with exams and marking.
- police or other municipal
bodies may have useful data to use as baselines
for neighbourhood profiles
but it may be time-consuming to find the right
channels and obtain access.
Need examples?
Examples of possible external data and uses
- school attendance records could show program effects re.
increased school engagement leading to improved
attendance, fewer skipped classes
- school promotion/report data could show improved academic
performance, possibly related to, e.g.,
literacy, homework completion, tutoring programs
- school intake data could show community rates of transiency
for context with programs building
school-community links
- community data e.g., fire
and police calls for rates of community dysfunction,
disturbance related
to community-building, youth pro-social programs
- tenants’ association, condominium association data,
e.g., incidents of vandalism as above
- public health
data re. incidence rates of problems, health
concerns related to specific initiatives,
e.g., teen smoking, eating disorders, teen pregnancy
- national youth survey data – context/comparison figures
on a variety of characteristics related
to family functioning, recreation, substance use, education,
employment etc. (Ontario
Child Health Survey (OCHS), National
Longitudinal Survey of Children and Youth (NLSCY).)
- census data
can provide aggregate information on
neighbourhoods
|