SEARCH
 
< previous section

Data Collection

 

5.3 Provide appropriate training to data collectors

  • awareness of confidentiality policy and procedures
  • commitment to the value of data collection for evaluation
  • knowledge to aid understanding of respondents (cultural, socioeconomic, scheduling)
  • understanding role of specific data in the evaluation (purpose, focus)

Need an example?

For example, if programs are evaluating change at the level of the individual youth, it will be necessary to link his/her specific pre-test and post-test data. Programs may also want to link data about each participant’s attendance and perhaps level of participation and achievement in the program.

  • familiarity with the final version of forms to be used and concerns that arose during retesting (See Step 4)
  • written instructions appropriate for different collection techniques, stressing importance of full, accurate records, correct identification of response data,
  • e.g., when and how to record identity of respondent
  • Since consistency of data collection is vital to evaluation, staff need adequate information and training to collect data in the same way across sites or sessions, even if there are only two data collection periods - pre- and post-tests. Consistent methods of data collection and handling can produce more reliable and credible results. Qualitative techniques also need to be conducted in a systematic and thoughtful way to provide accurate results.

  • stress on the importance of consistent explanations, methods across sites, sessions
  • practice sessions and role-plays are useful:
  • interviewing practice,
  • explaining and completing forms and questionnaires
  • making observations and using observation logs.
  • access to timely assistance from program supervisor for any questions or problems

 

< previous section
Last updated: July 2004
© 2004